Еще к вопросу об английской прессе
Oct. 29th, 2004 01:42 pmСамая лучшая раскладка была дана в сериале Yes, Minister 20 лет назад, и она верна до сих пор.
Minister: I know exactly who reads the papers. The Daily Express is read by people who think they run the country.
The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country.
The Times is read by people who actually do run the country.
The Daily Mirror is read by the wives of the people who run the country.
The Financial Times is read by people who own the country.
The Morning Star is read by people who think the country ought to be run by another country.
The Daily Telegraph is read by people who think it is.
Sir Humphrey: Minister, what about people who read the Sun.
Bernard: Sun readers don't care who runs the country as long as she's got big tits.
Еще не хватает пары газет:
The Daily Mail is read by people who think the country was run much better in the past.
А кто читает The Independent, я даже и не знаю.
Minister: I know exactly who reads the papers. The Daily Express is read by people who think they run the country.
The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country.
The Times is read by people who actually do run the country.
The Daily Mirror is read by the wives of the people who run the country.
The Financial Times is read by people who own the country.
The Morning Star is read by people who think the country ought to be run by another country.
The Daily Telegraph is read by people who think it is.
Sir Humphrey: Minister, what about people who read the Sun.
Bernard: Sun readers don't care who runs the country as long as she's got big tits.
Еще не хватает пары газет:
The Daily Mail is read by people who think the country was run much better in the past.
А кто читает The Independent, я даже и не знаю.
Был такой прикол в US
There are people who read New-York Times and they do rule the country.
And there are people who read the Observer. They know that Elvis is alive and rules the country.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 06:12 am (UTC)Or probably
Date: 2004-10-29 06:33 am (UTC)Только с той разницей,
Date: 2004-10-29 06:15 am (UTC)При чем тут читатели Guardian?
Date: 2004-10-29 06:20 am (UTC)Вот они как раз
Date: 2004-10-29 06:30 am (UTC)Re: Вот они как раз
Date: 2004-10-29 06:33 am (UTC)Re: Вот они как раз
Date: 2004-10-29 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 06:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 06:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 11:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 04:05 pm (UTC)It's rather saying something outrageous with a straight face, leaving you guessing for a second or two - do they really mean it, or are they being sarcastic? The Times is great in a sense that it never explains it, it trusts the readers' intelligence.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 06:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 10:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 12:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 03:05 pm (UTC)Я думаю, стоит смотреть сначала, потому что там идет развитие характеров и взаимоотношений.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-30 01:41 am (UTC)